According to Some People, Male Human Rights is an "Utter Abomination"

Non-feminist political existence is spreading across Canada, leapfrog style, and already the powers-that-be are launching into backlash mode against it. Case in point:  A pro-male placard recently appeared at the airport in Edmonton (YEG), and was violently attacked. People at the scene physically defaced the placard, of course, but that's not all.  Anti-male elements soon took it to the interwebs, too! The following was posted on Tumblr, and it speaks for itself:

So to explain the self-evident, a pro-male partisan posted this placard, which displays the web address of  A Voice for Men. Almost immediately, a kneejerk feeding frenzy of backlash kicked in. It seems that some folks don't want feminist dogma to be challenged in the forum of public discourse. Nor, I would guess, do they wish to see the male population galvanized as a self-aware political bloc which is vigilant for its interests. Only women are permitted to do that, don't ya know? Well if you think that is a terribly one-sided double standard, you are entirely correct.

At some point, somebody snapped this photo, and proceeded to post it on Tumblr.  The following is a screen capture of some comments which the photo inspired. As you can clearly see, somebody thinks that "men's rights" is a laughable idea, and somebody else is struck speechless by such an "utter abomination".

"What? Men are human beings with human rights? What an utter abomination!!"



Already, the forces of backlash have sprung to life, and a grassroots campaign of sorts has been launched in Edmonton, to put the kibosh on this silly business of so-called male human rights. Well. What we are seeing here is a taste of things to come. Just imagine how the cat fur is gonna fly, when counter-feminist presence becomes publicly visible all over the world everywhere.

Be vigilant, my brothers and sisters. If the other side must use violence, then mark my words, it will. More importantly, it will use spin, smear and slander tactics -- in other words, aggression. We have seen this already, and will undoubtedly see more.

We, of course, reject the use of violence in all but extreme cases of self-defense. However, the other side hasn't got such scruples, and they do command the engines of violence in many forms -- physical and spiritual, political and cultural, directly and by proxy.

Never forget that feminism is the ruling paradigm over much of the world, that the law and the mechanisms of governance are largely feminized, and that when you challenge the feminist power structure on ANY level, you are effectively butting heads with the power of the STATE, and you are likely to catch some nasty pushback if you make your presence felt too keenly.

Peace.