"The 31 year-old from Aberdeen, Scotland, falsely accused two strangers of sexual assault in a twisted bid to trap her boyfriend into their ailing relationship.
"The single mother-of-one claimed that two men broke into her home and committed the violent attack while her partner was away playing football.
"She then punched herself in the face and ripped her clothes to make the story appear more credible, before spending three days trawling social networking site Facebook to find innocent users she could ‘identify' as responsible.
"Her victims were then detained by police, questioned and forced to undergo intrusive forensic and medical examinations.
"Then, following two months of police investigations, Attridge confessed that the claim was a malicious lie - purposely designed to emotionally manipulate one man by legally manipulating two others."
Hopefully that has piqued your interest enough that you'll want to read the entire article:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2338427/This-time-sisterhood-Women-need-angry-rape-liars-like-Linsey-Attridge--shes-abusing-says-Peter-Lloyd.html
Yes, it seems that women sometimes claim to have been raped, when in fact nothing of the sort has transpired. In other words, women sometimes LIE about this. And not only that, but it seems they do so rather frequently. Some people might even say, too frequently. These stories crop up again and again, with monotonous regularity . . . . don't they?
At any rate, you ought to understand the meaning of this so-called "rape culture" which the feminists bang on and on about. Briefly, "rape culture" was created by feminism so that women like Linsey Attridge would feel "empowered" to "come forward" with lies to destroy innocent men. It is considerably more "thinkable" to permit such things in a climate of moral hysteria, isn't it? Of course it is, and that's the whole idea!
You see, the feminists want very badly to "end rape", and part of their plan is to lock up as many rapists as possible. But the only way for THAT to happen, is to get more convictions. So feminist legal innovation has streamlined the process of finding men guilty of rape, chiefly by "believing the woman" and lowering the threshold of evidence that would make her legally "believable" in the first place.
The side effect has been, that plenty of women are inspired to lay false rape charges, and in the end plenty of innocent men get destroyed one way or another. Some of these innocent men end up prison-raped, or even killed. But if you are a feminist you will figure that's okay, because at least this bumps up the odds that the guilty fish will get caught in the net too -- along with the innocent ones.
According to the feminist way of thinking, it's "all good" if innocent men get flung under the bus. It is acceptable collateral damage. And as the academic feminist Catherine Comins once reminded us, unjustly accused men might "possibly benefit" from their experience. So all in all I reckon it must be a good thing that so many women are lying about rape -- or at least nothing to get fussed about. Don't you think so?
And if you are a man, you should not worry about any of this because it probably won't happen to you! Right? I mean, it's not as if anybody sets a lower value upon male life or anything like that. Right?
Well okay, so the occasional "victims" like Linsey Attridge don't quite get away with it! Shucks! I reckon we should tighten things up a little bit more and then the system will be perfect. Right?
No comments:
Post a Comment