ad

19.9.13

Thought for the Moment - On Activism, Agitation, and Feminist Donkeys

If the feminists want to convince me that they care about men more than I do, they must submit to a pretty keen interrogation. And they had better pass that interrogation with flying colors. Otherwise, they can STFU on the theme of "you don't care about men, you're just anti-feminist."

If the feminists think they've got male human rights all sewed up, and if they pretend to understand those things better than non-feminist men do, then they are a passel of conceited jackasses. And to my mind, jackasses are good only for pulling the plow or hauling cargo under direction. So the feminists must take direction from the farmer - that's us! Do you reckon they'll cooperate? Or do you reckon they'll bray like asses and kick like mules?

There is no way you can genuinely care about men if you are not working to defeat or diminish feminism in some form. They who attack feminism, and they who undertake "good works" of pro-male activism, must be players on the same team. And which is more, they must understand this and respect each other. 

It is self-defeating to merely work within the feminist regime in order to secure benefits for men. That is a beggarly policy all around, because you are begging for scraps every step of the way, and even if you secure these, your hold upon them is tenuous because one force or another is apt to snatch them away at any time.

Feminism is an earthly power whose legitimacy we dispute, and the only way to meaningfully "help men", in the long run, is to bring about feminism's collapse. Yes, it is true that activistic good works will weaken the feminist power structure, and I do not mean to depreciate such efforts. But such efforts ALONE will not suffice. Along with activism, you must have counter-feminist agitation. 

People who say "you're just anti-feminist", as if that were a bad thing, are hauling water for the feminists. Jackasses working for jackasses. Ironic, isn't it?

No comments:

pages listed by date