Counter-Feminist Foundational Points -- Part 1

What follows is a point-by-point compendium of Counter-Feminist philosophy, in considerable depth. I will extend this through as many separate blog posts as necessary.


1. The dictionary definition of feminism runs as follows: "The doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men." This definition is inadequate owing to the problematic nature of the term "equality", which has no stable meaning outside the realm of mathematics. Consequently, the meaning can forever be refreshed, reframed or updated so that new demands for "equality" can always be put forward. So there will never be enough "equality", and feminism will never go out of business because it will always find new "inequality" in need of correction.

2. Feminism's binding principle and driving force is disaffection toward men and maleness. This is arrayed on a spectrum, with mild disenchantment to the lower end, and vitriolic animosity, bordering on psychopathic, to the upper. If disaffection toward men, as men, did not exist in the world generally, then feminism itself would not exist. Feminism is not driven by vehemence about mere issues and abstract principles. Its politics are rooted in personal feelings about men.  Feminism's political, you might say, is personal. And so personal emotion is the only thing that keeps feminism in motion.

3. Feminism divides broadly into two cultural cohorts: Academic feminism (more intellectual), and pop feminism (less intellectual). These make opposing ends of a polarity, with a continuum stretching between them. Feminism as a whole needs both the academic and the pop cohorts. The academic cohort is needful so that feminism will have an intellectual vanguard -- so that the snake will have a head, in other words. The pop cohort is needful so that the vanguard ideology will be demographically incarnated in numbers -- so that the snake will have a body, in other words. Sophisticated ideas originate from the academic cohort, and trickle down to the pop cohort by the process of popularization.

4. At any point on the academic-pop continuum, you will find feminists from any point on the disaffection spectrum. Simply observe that the identical range of viciousness shows up at every intellectual level. Along with viciousness comes irrationality or intellectual dishonesty. All of this is transparent among the undisciplined pop feminists, but concealed under layers of erudite doubletalk among the academics. 

5. Feminism at large should be understood as a social organism, or mechanism if you prefer. The bottom line, is a division of functions which generates the illusion that "feminism is not monolithic." That cliché is either true or false, depending on how you apply the term "monolithic". It is true that feminism has many brands, flavors, schools of thought, "aspects", and so on. In that regard, it is anything but monolithic. But when you consider that these different manifestations combine toward a common purpose as the parts of an organism or mechanism would do, then feminism emerges as One Thing -- hence "monolithic". Accordingly, so far as we are concerned, feminism is indeed monolithic.

6. Several counter-feminist (or reality-based) definitions of feminism have been proposed, all of  which point in the same general direction. One of these runs as follows: "Feminism is the project to increase the power of women." When you combine this with the dictionary definition (which describes feminism as a quest for "equality") and when you consider that "equality" is a mirage shimmering always out of reach, it is easy to see that chasing so-called "equality" ad infinitum, will only increase the power of women ad infinitum. But to increase the power of women, you must increase it in relation to something, and that "something" can only be men.  So by its inherent logic, the feminist project can only be the project to put women in a state of power supremacy over men. In sum, therefore, feminism is female supremacism.

7. Feminism's most effective safeguard against discovery, is to ridicule the very idea that it (feminism) is female supremacist, and to mock whoever might advance such an idea. Such words as "paranoid" or "misogynistic" will characteristically be employed to this end.

8. The project to increase women's power does not positively require disaffection toward men. But without it, the project would face a practical limit -- to wit, the constraint that mutuality and unselfish regard for the other might impose. Yet sweep all that aside and you can pave the road of depredation as far as your lack of scruples will carry you. Indeed, that is where disaffection toward men comes in handy, and where the project to increase female power hits no glass ceiling of any kind. 

9. Advocacy for women's interests, in whatever form, will increase female advantage and thereby increase female power. Yet the advocates involved in such work needn't feel any conscious hostility toward men. They need only carry on industriously, disavow anti-male sentiments, and draw attention away from high-disaffection feminists by such distractionary statements as "not all feminists are like that", or "I'm not that kind of feminist", or "those people are only fringe extremists." At times, they will deny that such feminists are even feminists at all. Still, the latter will continue to exist, and to do what they do, while their milder sisters look the other way. 

10.The proclivity of feminism is to grow in the direction of greater female empowerment. In so doing, it initiates changes in the surrounding world. These changes create endless new obstacles to the female empowerment project, and force endless modifications to feminist policy in order to overcome said obstacles. At times, these modifications will involve changing the rules of the game altogether. There is no help for this, for if feminism operated from a fixed and finite set of rules, it would leave degrees of freedom that would permit male autonomy to operate. And this, in turn, would set an absolute upper limit on female empowerment. Code-switching, from one code of rules to another, is therefore an inherent feature of feminism as a social organism. 

11. Feminist code-switching operates through space as well as through time, since at any given moment an indefinite number of distinct feminist rule systems, planet-wide, are found to be operating.  This is quite understandable, given that women differ greatly as to taste, inclination, personality, station in life, and so on. Hence, their exact empowerment needs will differ, and each must employ a suitable code of rules.

12. We may summarize by saying that feminism's being is identical with its being-in-motion. "Perpetual Revolution" is the name we have given to this condition.

-----------------------------------------------------

The list of foundational Counter-Feminist points will be continued in future installments.

Download Game I.G.I 2 - Covert Strike Rip 100% Working

I.G.I 2 Covert Strike. Sekarang saya akan bagikan sebuah game yang menurut saya sangat seru apalagi sahabat haramain software juga menyukai game yang bergenre shooter.

Game yang ingin saya bagikan ini bernama  I.G.I 2 Covert Strike. Game covert strike ini adalah game shooter yang bisa di bilang mirip dengan game counter strike point blak cuma bedanya kalau counter strike point blank adalah game online dan covert strike ini adalah game offline.

Pada game covert strike ini kita diberikan misi-misi yang harus kita selesaikan yang pasti akan menantang bagi para sahabat haramain software. bagi sahabat haramain software yang sudah pernah memainkan game ini pasti tau serunya game ini. Game ini juga sudah saya uji dan 100% Working kalau sahabat haramain software mengikuti cara install yang sudah saya sertakan di dalam file yang di download.

Screenshoot :

Untuk cara install sudah saya sertakan di dalam file yang di download. Bagi yang ingin mendownload, silahkan download pada link dibawah ini.

Download Game I.G.I 2 Covert Strike Rip ( 176 Mb )

Selamat bermain dan semoga bermanfaat

MTV’s VMA’s| The good, the bad and the ugly

Last night was a huge night for celebrities, press and fashion lovers everywhere. Not only was it Fashion Night Out, it was also the MTV Video Music Awards, which is always eventful. This year saw the reunion of Rihanna and Chris Brown, with them sharing a little kiss in front of all to see. However it is not the show that I am interested in, my guilty pleasure with award shows, which I guess I share with many of you, is to cast my critical eye upon the fashion on the red carpet. So I will share with you my pick of the good, the bad and the ugly.

• Emma Watson did us British girls proud, and showed up in a fun and flirty dress. Although the loud print is not something I would wear, I admire that she let the dress do the talking and kept accessories, hair and makeup to a minimal.
• Demi Lovato was my favourite, she dressed down this sparkly cocktail dress with her studded leather jacket, but her dramatic red lips and long tumbling waves make her look smart enough to be walking the red carpet.
• Miley Cyrus dressed to impress! Like Demi Lovato she channelled her inner rock chick. Miley's dress alone is beautiful, but her chose of accessories, and her dramatic quiff have made the dress more fun.
• Katy Perry’s dress hugs her curves and gives us a glimpse of her legs, making her look like a vixen. I’m not one hundred per cent certain of the print, but no one can deny that she looks incredibly sexy. I think I am most in love with her hair and makeup choices, very glamourous.

• Jessica Szohr’s outfit just looks a mess. I don’t really know where to begin, so I shall just say it all. In my opinion her top looks like it’s a piece of supportive shape-wear, the skirt it too casual, as are the trainers, and the headband is just wrong. This is not a red carpet suitable outfit.
• Rihanna is a girl who’s outfits I either love of hate, and unfortunately I hate this one. If the dress did not have the knot detail on the front I think I would love it, but as it does Rihanna looks like she is wearing her bed sheet and is on her way to a toga party.
• Rita Ora… oh dear! I admit the detailing on the jumpsuit is exquisite, but it is not flattering in the slightest. The girl has such a great body, she should be making the most of it.
• Pink really disappointed me in this dress. Like Rita Ora she has an amazing body and yet she has covered every inch of it. I do actually love the dress; if only it showed more skin.

I know Nikki Minaj is an obviously choice for a girl who gets it wrong, but she just can’t be avoided.  I agree her body is ridiculous… even if her bum does scare me a bit, but there is no need to show it off all the time. There is not one thing right with her ensemble, too tight, too many fabrics and textures and too much detail.

Do you agree with my picks? Or was there someone else who caught your eye? Let me know what you think!

New Video -- Finding Your Mountain-Top

Friends, We Taught Them a Lesson!

Our social heat and pressure campaign against the NoProject, conducted only yesterday, has borne fruit. The offending, pustulently anti-male and anti-father graphic image, was removed. The following link formerly took you to the picture in question, but now it takes you to . . . . zippity-doo-dah! ;)

www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=409332962449754&set=a.169356863114033.35305.128252147224505&type=1&theater

















I must say, I'm right proud to be the one who pushed the first domino.

I'm sure that in the future, these people will be a shade more circumspect about launching anti-male memes into the world. I think they've gotten the message that slamming and sliming men is unacceptable, especially in the political context we've got nowadays.  So I reckon we've made the world a shade less toxic for men and maleness. A small victory, but victory it truly is!

I 'd recommend archiving the accompanying image for the sake of fond memories!